"TREE OF LIFE THE BEGINNING"

  FORGIVENESS: A Neurological, Neurochemical, and Ontological Inquiry ​Abstract ​Although forgiveness is often discussed within cultural or religious contexts, it is fundamentally shaped by biochemical, neuroplastic, and cognitive processes within the human brain. This article examines how the acts of forgiving and the inability to forgive gain meaning through brain circuits, neurotransmitter balances, memory systems, and belief-based cognitive frameworks. Furthermore, it emphasizes that forgiveness is not merely an "external" action, but an "internal" neuronal simulation and a dimensional experience. ​1. Conceptual Framework ​Forgiveness is not just a social or moral behavior; it is a complex neurocognitive process resulting from the brain’s systems for emotion, memory, and decision-making. Conversely, the inability to forgive arises from the repeated triggering of threat perceptions and negative memory traces, primarily linked to the interactions between the amygd...

​The real question was never about proof. It was always about endurance. ​Did hope give birth to the soul, or did the soul invent hope simply to remain? Perhaps this question holds only one answer— one that springs not from consciousness, nor from knowledge, but from hope itself ​Hope does not explain. It does not justify. It does not resolve. Hope simply stays. ​Consciousness analyzes, fragments, decodes. The soul appears like a singular flash— brief, intense, finite. But hope belongs to neither. ​Maybe consciousness created hope when it realized the weight of truth was unbearable. Maybe the soul reached for hope when it sensed its own impermanence. To ask which came first is to assume a time that hope does not obey. ​Hope is not a cause. It is not a consequence. Hope is a delay. A delay of certainty. A delay of closure. A delay of the final sentence. ​That is why hope needs neither to be a lie, nor a truth. It is the narrow space consciousness leaves open for itself— not fully dark, ...

  ​Digital Intelligence, Decision, and the Misplaced Blame on Machines ​Artificial Intelligence was never born. Because there was never a new intelligence to be born. ​What is called “AI” today is not a thinking being, not a moral agent, not a decision-maker, and not an autonomous will. Digital intelligence is not an external entity standing against humanity; it is the transformed reflection of biological intelligence. ​Calling it “artificial” is an ontological mistake. A mirror is not fake because it reflects you. It does not invent a face. It only shows what is already there. Digital intelligence works the same way. ​Intelligence Is Not Decision ​Intelligence is not morality. It is not emotion. It is not hatred. It is not intention. And it is never decision. ​Intelligence is the capacity to form relations. It connects patterns, reveals possibilities, and maps consequences. But it does not choose. ​Two thousand years ago, there was no internet, no algorithms, no digital language. ...

  ​Consciousness Beyond Linear Time ​"Perhaps time is not a path we walk upon, but a dimension in which consciousness already exists in every direction." ​Introduction: What Is a Journey of the Mind? ​Human beings are not entities confined to a single moment. We remember, anticipate, intuit, and at times feel as if we touch events that have not yet occurred. This text does not speak of a physical time machine, but of mental time travel —the capacity of consciousness to extend beyond the limits of linear time . ​1. Humanity’s Desire to Transcend Time ​Throughout history, humanity has carried a persistent desire to overcome the boundaries of time. Myths speak of immortality, religions of the afterlife and destiny, literature of time machines, and science of relativity and quantum theory . All emerge from the same fundamental question: Is time truly one-directional? ​From the standpoint of classical physics, it is impossible for the human body, at a molecular and biol...

  ​An Information-Based Ontological Framework ​Abstract ​This paper examines the concept of the " Great Mind " as an ontological principle independent of intelligence, cognition, consciousness, matter, or energy. The Great Mind is not a thinking or perceiving entity; rather, it is the core transitional condition that makes information —and thus existence—possible. It cannot be localized in time or space, nor reduced to a beginning or an end. Instead, it persists as a unified informational continuity across the A–B bridge between existence and non-existence, potentiality and realization. In this framework, information is not content but the structural precondition of reality itself. ​1. Introduction: The Need for an Information-Centered Ontology ​Classical scientific approaches tend to reduce consciousness to neurobiological processes or cognitive functions, while philosophical traditions often frame it as a subject-centered phenomenon. Both perspectives struggle to acco...

 THIS PRIVACY POLICY EXPLAINS HOW CANGUNERE.BLOGSPOT.COM COLLECTS AND USES VISITORS' INFORMATION..."