"TREE OF LIFE THE BEGINNING"

  ​Consciousness Beyond Linear Time ​"Perhaps time is not a path we walk upon, but a dimension in which consciousness already exists in every direction." ​Introduction: What Is a Journey of the Mind? ​Human beings are not entities confined to a single moment. We remember, anticipate, intuit, and at times feel as if we touch events that have not yet occurred. This text does not speak of a physical time machine, but of mental time travel —the capacity of consciousness to extend beyond the limits of linear time . ​1. Humanity’s Desire to Transcend Time ​Throughout history, humanity has carried a persistent desire to overcome the boundaries of time. Myths speak of immortality, religions of the afterlife and destiny, literature of time machines, and science of relativity and quantum theory . All emerge from the same fundamental question: Is time truly one-directional? ​From the standpoint of classical physics, it is impossible for the human body, at a molecular and biol...

  ​An Information-Based Ontological Framework ​Abstract ​This paper examines the concept of the " Great Mind " as an ontological principle independent of intelligence, cognition, consciousness, matter, or energy. The Great Mind is not a thinking or perceiving entity; rather, it is the core transitional condition that makes information —and thus existence—possible. It cannot be localized in time or space, nor reduced to a beginning or an end. Instead, it persists as a unified informational continuity across the A–B bridge between existence and non-existence, potentiality and realization. In this framework, information is not content but the structural precondition of reality itself. ​1. Introduction: The Need for an Information-Centered Ontology ​Classical scientific approaches tend to reduce consciousness to neurobiological processes or cognitive functions, while philosophical traditions often frame it as a subject-centered phenomenon. Both perspectives struggle to acco...

 THIS PRIVACY POLICY EXPLAINS HOW CANGUNERE.BLOGSPOT.COM COLLECTS AND USES VISITORS' INFORMATION..."

 ABOUT ME: HELLO, I'M E.G., A BLOGGER USER SINCE 2015. MY WRITINGS ARE FOR SCIENTIFIC AND ONTOLOGICAL PURPOSES AND RELATED TO THEORIES I'VE DEVELOPED MYSELF. GENERALLY, I DEAL WITH EXISTENCE AND QUANTUM TOPICS IN MY WRITINGS, AND TEMPORAL REFERENCES. TIME IS A SYMMETRY, AND THE ONTOLOGY OF EXISTENCE IN C IS BETWEEN A AND B. MY WRITINGS ARE AVAILABLE IN MANY LANGUAGES AND ARE READ BY A LARGE AUDIENCE WORLDWIDE. I HOPE YOU WILL ALSO READ THE WRITINGS AND SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS WITH ME IN THE COMMENTS SECTION.  I hope you have an enjoyable time and thank you for visiting my page: cangunere.blogspot.com

A New Ontology of Atom, Information, and Field Introduction: Why Is a New Theory Needed? Modern physics defines the atom and quantum phenomena largely through measurement outcomes. Wave–particle duality , the uncertainty principle , and field theories successfully calculate how nature behaves. However, most of these models explain behavior rather than what something is. This text begins not with behavior, but with ontology . This work starts from the following claim: Matter is not fundamental; information is. The atom is not a combination of particles, but a capsule in which information acquires form within a field. We call this approach Digital Alphabet Theory . 1. Science, Measurement, and the Limits of Models Science does not bring things into existence; it names and models what already exists. Just as days, hours, and seconds are not time itself, atomic models are not the essence of matter. They are reference systems produced by human perception and measurement capacity. Therefore,...

  ​The Real Story Behind Quantum Uncertainty ​Nature is not probabilistic. It is temporally undersampled. ​Science never progresses in a vacuum. Every theory is born inside the limits of its era: the tools available, the resolution achievable, and the language used to describe reality. What we now call “quantum uncertainty” is not a timeless truth about nature, but the visible boundary of how far humanity could see at a specific moment in history. ​This story does not begin with the atom. It begins with motion. ​From Purpose to Force For Aristotle , motion was intentional. Objects moved toward their natural place. The universe was teleological, not mechanical. This worldview survived for centuries because it required no precise measurement—direct observation was enough. ​ Newton shattered this view. Motion became the result of force. The universe transformed into a deterministic machine. Yet this machine still described only what could be seen, touched, and measured directly. ​The...