EPILOGUE

 

EPILOGUE

What Does a Human Being Tell Themselves While Sleeping?

On existence, a wave, and information beyond time.

What does a human being think while sleeping?

More precisely, what does a person tell themselves before falling asleep?

Throughout the day, we speak, listen, see, feel, and make decisions. We live within a life we believe belongs to us. We remember our past, imagine our future, and regard the present moment as the center of our existence.

Night arrives.

We close our eyes.

The world gradually grows silent for us.

Yet the world does not fall silent when we close our eyes. Physical processes continue in the room. Radio waves, wireless communication signals, and electromagnetic waves beyond visible light are part of a reality we cannot directly perceive.

We do not see them.

Yet a phone receives certain signals we cannot see, processes them, and transforms them into images on a screen. A sound, a photograph, a film, or a few lines of text…

An invisible process of transmission becomes an expression we can see.

So let us ask:

When does a human being acknowledge the existence of something they cannot see? When that thing exists, or only when they become able to perceive it?

This is where the door to EPILOGUE opens.

The Invisible Is Not the Beginning of Existence

Objects fell before Newton. Electromagnetic phenomena existed before Tesla. Light existed before human beings understood its properties.

Humanity did not create nature; humanity came into existence within nature and began discovering how it works.

Today, different physical processes can occur simultaneously in a single room. Radio waves, visible light, infrared radiation, and other electromagnetic waves have different properties. Our senses cannot perceive all of them.

Even where a phone has no reception, nature continues to function independently of the phone’s ability to communicate.

There is an important distinction here: the fact that something is not perceived does not mean it does not physically exist. Human senses experience not the entirety of reality, but a particular portion of it.

Yet within my Resonance Theory, the question does not end here.

I am not merely questioning the existence of invisible waves. I am investigating the relationship between information and the formation of existence.

Are human beings born only into a world that already existed before them? Or does their existence also involve a relationship with information that began before their own consciousness?

My theory approaches this question through the direction of time.

Because the existence of something and the way it came into existence are not the same question.

Waves and the Expression of Information

You are reading this text on your phone.

The letters you see on the screen are not little pieces of writing floating through the air. Digital data is transmitted through communication systems. Your phone receives this data, processes it, and transforms it into a visible expression.

The information being transmitted and the expression that becomes visible are different things.

The same communication infrastructure can transmit a novel, a musical composition, a scientific formula, or an image. The physical properties of a signal are not the same as the meaning of the content it carries.

Here, a greater question emerges:

Does the relationship between information and what expresses it belong only to technological devices?

In my theory, this question extends to existence itself.

Information is not merely a record of events that have already occurred. I regard it as a fundamental element in understanding formation and order.

A phone converting a received signal into an image and a human being coming into existence are not the same physical event. Yet this example opens an important door to thinking about the relationship between information, its carrier, and its expression.

What I am investigating is the dimension of this relationship that extends all the way to the beginning of existence.

Humanity discovered waves. But did human beings themselves come into existence within a relationship with information they have not yet fully understood?

The Fourth Miracle: The Invisible Color

Look at a red flower.

When you see it, you might think that redness is an inherent property residing within the flower itself. Yet the experience of color arises through the properties of light, the interaction between light and the object, and the combined functioning of the eyes and brain.

Electromagnetic waves beyond visible light also exist. The human eye cannot see them as colors.

This means that the world we see is not the entirety of physical reality.

The eye is sensitive to certain wavelengths. The ear hears within certain frequency ranges. Human beings experience the world through the windows opened by their perceptual systems.

The question of color explored in my essay The Fourth Miracle concerns more than the sense of sight. The real issue is the relationship between what exists and what is perceived.

Human beings may dismiss what they cannot see. But not seeing is not proof of absence.

Another question emerges:

Is the world we perceive existence itself, or is it the face of existence revealed to us?

For me, this question occupies a fundamental place in the study of consciousness and information.

Human beings inhabit not only the world they can see, but also a world they cannot see.

Light, Sound, and C

Light and sound do not travel at the same speed.

Light travels through a vacuum at approximately 300,000 kilometers per second, while sound travels through air at about 343 meters per second under normal conditions. We see lightning before we hear thunder.

These two phenomena demonstrate that different modes of propagation exist in the physical world.

A phone receives an electromagnetic signal and transforms it into an image or sound. The human brain also processes incoming stimuli through neural processes. However, signal transmission, signal processing, and conscious human experience are distinct processes.

For me, the central issue is understanding the relationship between information, observation, and existence beyond these differences.

In my A–B–C Theory:

A represents the past and what has already occurred.

B represents the idea of a completed future and total information.

C expresses the relationship, transition, and observational position between A and B.

Within this framework, time is not treated merely as a line progressing from the past to the future. The relationship between information, the observer, and existence is also questioned.

I do not equate C directly with the speed of light or with sound. In my theory, C is the conceptual center of the relationship.

Sound, light, and electromagnetic waves are different physical phenomena. My investigation reaches beyond these phenomena toward the relationship between information and existence.

Human beings experience time. But do we truly know what time is?

The Human Being Beyond Sound

Before a person speaks, a process takes place.

An intention emerges. An emotional orientation forms. The nervous system becomes active. A thought takes shape, a word is selected, and sound emerges.

There is a process connecting inner experience with outward expression.

In my work, I approach this relationship through the following sequence:

Intention → Emotional Orientation → Neural Pattern → Thought → Word → Sound

The inner voice is the form an expression takes within a person before it is spoken aloud. I call this sensory cryptography.

In my theoretical vocabulary, this concept describes the relationship between inner experience and its outward expression.

We think of a word before speaking it. Sometimes we remember a face before seeing it. At other times, we encounter a feeling we have not yet learned to name.

So where does a thought begin when it emerges within us?

Our memories, habits, surroundings, and neural processes influence our thoughts. Yet questioning how a thought arises also leads to a broader question:

Where does the relationship between information and expression begin?

My theory investigates this question not only within the human mind, but within existence as a whole.

When the Information of the Future Shapes Existence in the Past

Human beings generally think of time as moving in one direction.

First comes the past. Then the present. After that, the future.

We are born, grow, live, and die. Our everyday experience presents us with this line.

Yet my A–B–C Theory argues that this line is insufficient to explain the entirety of existence.

If A represents the past, B represents the completed future, and C represents the relationship between these two ends, then the essential question is:

Does the future merely come after the past, or does information belonging to the future also play a role in the formation of existence in the past?

This is where the radical claim of my theory begins.

I argue that the completed information of the future is related to formation in the past. In this framework, B does not simply mean days that have not yet been lived. B represents the idea of a completed future and total information. A represents existence in the past, while C is the center through which we can contemplate the connection between them.

I am not referring here to an internet transmitter built in the future sending radio signals backward into the past. Internet waves provide a concrete example of how invisible information can be transmitted. My theory makes a broader claim: the relationship between information and existence must be considered beyond the familiar linear conception of time.

This is not a conclusion established by current physics; it is an ontological proposition I put forward.

Now, let us consider the first human being.

The first human did not design their own DNA. They did not enter the world knowing how their cells would develop. The biological processes at the beginning of life occurred before any conscious human decision.

Human beings came into existence without knowing all the conditions that brought them into being.

So we must ask:

When did human beings acquire knowledge of their own existence? At the moment of coming into being, or when they began to interpret that existence?

Within my theory, this question opens onto the relationship between the completed information of the future and formation in the past.

The proposition that information from the future plays a role in existence in the past is the most radical point of my investigation.

The First Human, DNA, and the Beginning

The formation of a human being involves countless biological processes coming together.

DNA carries hereditary information. Cells develop, genes are expressed, and the organism interacts with its environment. Life takes shape through interconnected processes.

Yet a human being does not consciously design their own formation.

A human being comes into existence and then begins to understand themselves and the world.

Here, my theoretical question emerges:

Should we consider the relationship between information and formation only through the sum of causes in the past?

My answer is no.

Within my A–B–C framework, I do not limit existence to a one-way line extending from past to future. I consider the idea of completed information represented by B in relation to formation in A. C is the center of this relationship.

When I apply this idea to the beginning of human existence, the following proposition emerges:

The formation of the first human should be considered not only through past conditions, but also through the relationship between existence and completed information.

This claim does not mean that DNA has been shown to have been created by internet waves. Such a physical mechanism would have to be demonstrated separately. But the question posed by my ontological theory is more fundamental:

When searching for the beginning in the past, can we leave the relationship with information from the future outside our thinking?

My investigation places this question at its center.

Fireless Smoke: The Ancient Language of the Invisible

Ancient humans looked at the sky.

They saw lights, watched shadows, and heard thunder. They encountered events whose visible sources they could not explain.

They described these experiences in the language of their world.

One society interpreted thunder as a divine voice. Another regarded movements in the sky as sacred signs. Myths, symbols, and rituals became part of humanity’s effort to make sense of nature and its own existence.

In my thinking, fireless smoke is a metaphor for an influence whose effects can be felt even when no visible object is present.

Today, we can see the data carried by a wireless communication signal on a phone screen. An invisible physical process can become a visible expression through a suitable receiver.

This example does not prove that all symbols of ancient civilizations were connected to electromagnetic waves. But it keeps alive the question of how human beings interpret invisible influences.

Ancient people described unfamiliar events through their beliefs. Modern people explain certain invisible phenomena through concepts such as frequency, fields, and information.

Language has changed. Tools have changed. Humanity’s ways of explaining the world have changed.

But the fundamental question remains:

When human beings encounter a reality beyond the limits of their perception, what do they see, what do they understand, and what do they tell?

Creation, Destiny, and the Completed Future

What is destiny?

Human beings live without knowing every detail of the future. There are events they do not know when they will encounter. Yet they plan, make decisions, and try to shape their lives.

In theological thought, destiny is associated with creation and divine knowledge. In my theory, the idea of a completed future is one of the central concepts I use to reconsider the relationship between time and information.

In my A–B–C approach, B represents the completed future. This does not mean that human beings can read all future events today. Within my theoretical framework, B is an idea of information that goes beyond the one-directional perception of time.

Human beings remember the past, make decisions today, and think about the future. They act without knowing all the consequences of their decisions.

At this point, questions of destiny and free will converge.

Human beings make decisions influenced by their past, their present circumstances, and their expectations of the future. Yet the time people experience and the question of what time itself is are not the same thing.

My theory asks:

Is the future merely the place we are heading toward, or is it a dimension of information that must be considered from the very beginning when trying to understand existence?

This is the intellectual center of EPILOGUE.

What Does a Human Being Tell Themselves While Sleeping?

Let us return to the bed.

The day is over.

A person closes their eyes.

They remember the people they spoke to during the day. They complete an unfinished sentence in their mind. They think about what they will do in the future. Sometimes they remain within a feeling without forming a single word.

As we fall asleep, conscious thoughts change. The brain remains active during sleep. Dreams arise, although we do not remember every dream we experience.

We cannot always explain how our thoughts begin.

Why did a memory return now?

Why did a word come back to mind after so many years?

Why did a thought emerge at that exact moment?

Memory, attention, emotions, and neural processes contribute to these experiences. Yet questioning the source of our own mental experience also raises the question of what consciousness is.

In my Resonance Theory, a human being is not merely a receiver of influences from the external world. A human being forms relationships with the past, the environment, the inner world, and thoughts about the future.

Here, the question at the heart of my A–B–C approach emerges once again:

Where should a person look for the beginning of their own thoughts?

Only in memory?

Only in the brain’s activity at that moment?

Or should we consider the relationship between existence, information, and time within a broader ontological framework?

I investigate the third question.

Because EPILOGUE is not merely an essay about sleep. It is an inquiry into how human beings interpret their own existence through information, an understanding of time, and an idea of beginnings.

The Final Question: What Am I Thinking?

Before falling asleep, let a person ask themselves one question:

What am I thinking?

Then let them add a second:

Where did this thought come from?

From a memory?

A fear?

A desire?

A word heard during the day?

Or an inner inclination that has not yet found a name?

When people investigate the source of their thoughts, they begin to question not only their own minds, but their own existence.

Waves, information, matter, DNA, consciousness, time, and destiny…

These belong to different fields of inquiry. In my theory, the central question connecting them all is the relationship between information and existence.

Internet waves demonstrate how an invisible signal can be transmitted. A phone receives and processes that signal. A human being sees, reads, and interprets the resulting expression.

My theory carries this relationship to the beginning of existence.

The completed information of the future is related to formation in the past.

This is the radical proposition of my A–B–C Theory.

Human beings live without knowing their own beginnings. They enter the world without designing their own formation. They exist within a nature and a history that began before them.

My theory takes the question further:

Should human beings search for their beginnings only in the past?

Or must an explanation of their existence also include a relationship with the completed information of the future?

A person closes their eyes.

The outside world grows silent.

Yet existence does not cease. The question of information does not close. The question of what time is continues to await an answer.

And on the threshold of sleep, a person asks one final question:

Am I the one who thinks, or am I living within a form of existence whose beginning extends further back than I imagined?

EPILOGUE ends here.

But the real question begins again when the person wakes:

Where was my beginning?

ERCAN GÜNER.